Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] CCWG ICANN Accountability second draft report -- numbers related analysis [9/12 comment deadline]
Thank you Richard for sharing your comment.
To all colleagues,
FYI, all comments to the ICANN Accountability second draft proposal are posted at : http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/
Izumi
On 2015/09/11 14:45, Richard Hill wrote:
> Please see inline below.
>
> Thanks and best,
> Richard
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net [mailto:ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net] On
>> Behalf Of Izumi Okutani
>> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 01:41
>> To: <ianaxfer@apnic.net>
>> Subject: [IANAxfer@apnic] CCWG ICANN Accountabilitysecond draft report
>> -- numbers related analysis [9/12 comment deadline]
>>
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> 6. Community Mechanism as Sole Member Model
>>
>> The first Draft Report suggested that these powers would be exercised
>> by changing ICANN's structure into a membership-based organisation,
>> with the SO/ACs as the members (Membership Model). An alternative model
>> was also investigated, whereby the SO/ACs would become designators
>> (Designator Model).
>>
>> During the public consultation and thereafter, objections were
>> expressed to both of these models. As a result of further discussions
>> and consultations, the second Draft Report introduces a new structure
>> called the Sole Membership Model.
>>
>
> SNIP
>>
>> Do you have any comments with regard to this model?
>
> Yes, see:
>
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00002.h
> tml
>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Izumi Okutani
>> ASO representative for ICANN Accoutability CCWG
>> _______________________________________________
>> IANAxfer mailing list
>> IANAxfer@apnic.net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>