Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee
Maemura San,
> so the working group would be
What would you like the name of the working group to be? One suggestion
could be "wg-nir-fee at lists dot apnic dot net"?
Also please advise of the names of those who should be subscribed to
the working group.
The Secretariat will set this up and let you know as soon as it is
done.
Best wishes,
Anne
--
> 1) to be closed within NIRs and APNIC Secretariat
> 2) to share the fee and address size figure among us
> 3) to try some models to see if one is reasonable
> 4) to open the result as soon as we try till 3)
> 5) Should conclude after open discussion
>
>
> I thinks APNIC Secretariat will work for keeping the closed
> discussion reasonable for whole membership.
>
>
> EC and non-NIR colleagues please advise me if you have
> any suggestion to keep this agenda confortable to whole
> membership.
>
>
> Regards,
> MAEMURA Akinori, on behalf of one of NIR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In message <01b401c4ab70$551d0ab0$8fd0ffcb@LocalHost>
> "Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee"
> ""ywju" <ywju at nic dot or dot kr>" wrote:
>
> | Dear all,
> |
> | To begin with, Thank Maemura for your good suggestion.
> | About Maemura's suggestion, my opinion is as belows.
> |
> |
> | > NIR Colleagues,
> | >
> | > Regarding the NIR Fee, JPNIC IP Department has just had a
> | > brief discussion.
> | >
> | > One of the way to look for a reasonable fee schedule is
> | > raising some example schedules and/or models and then
> | > applying current facts to verify if it is reasonable.
> |
> | Yes, sure.
> |
> | > We notice that for verification we need all figures from
> | > per address fee amount, number of members and total address
> | > space of all NIRs'. but they are of course not disclosed.
> |
> | I agree with this.And as I think, we need the information on budget status
> | of each NIR.
> | That is to say, we should consider NIR's operation cost of each NIR
> | in order to check how much APNIC fee affect NIR's financial status under
> | their own economic situation.
> |
> | > I think in this case we should form a *closed* working group
> | > which contains all NIRs and APNIC Secretariat to share such
> | > closed data.
> |
> | In this context, I also have the same idea with JPNIC. We should form
> | WG which will be participated from all NIRs & APNIC.
> |
> | I also expect another good ideas from other NIRs.
> |
> | Sincerely yours,
> |
> | Yong Wan Ju
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | sig-nir mailing list
> | sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
> | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
>
> _______________________________________________
> sig-nir mailing list
> sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
>