Hi Satoru, I’m not sure to understand your comments. If the exising SOR is not being use, it means that removing it will not make a significant difference, right? So we’re not making allocations easier, we are just trusting that if the SOR is not being used, we should adapt the policy to existing reality. In any case, if a LIR come back for more resources, and has been assigning addresses to customers without a good justification, they will need to justifiy that during the APNIC review. We shall also remember that we have no more IPv4 addresses, so will not make a big difference. In the case of IPv6, normally a houshold will not get more than /48. A business will probably will get a /48, and if they are smart enough, they will avoid renumbering getting a provider independent assigment directly from APNIC, so if they instead require a /47, for example, that will be part of the justification already. So, in summary, I really think there are not chances to abuse of the policy with the proposed change, and instead we have a simplification of procedures for both, members and secretariat. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet Dear Colleagues, 2021年8月13日(金) 8:58 Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc>:
-- -- Satoru Tsurumaki BBIX, Inc * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. |