Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi Jordi and all,
Will respond on Monday as we're currently recuperating from the APRICOT week :) Stay tuned.
Sent from my mobile.
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <email@example.com> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:20:59 PM To: mailman_SIG-policy <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could the secretariat point
out to the specific text about that? If it has been removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to remove that reference and avoid the mismatch.
One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead of using their own allocation?
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.