Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

  • To: Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc>, Policy SIG <sig-policy@apnic.net>
  • Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:20:21 +1100
  • Delivered-to: sig-policy@clove.apnic.net
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1582258833; x=1582863633; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Mime-version: Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=nGZJfvxfFVckbHiixQW0q dFvM/IkYMVN2qMhLzw1BDE=; b=s71JNPpOuwIneIBswz39sQbefszW0vJD7RPQl OtrLMjfHYO3tY7Gu5Ceqy//xCzRUQfaGafaLlgbwz9ZUIPQFwAkoKLRZmEyhA4/i rcFUZJ6egBFz2/isvx46nnWZpY93IfVWF406mnkjbNloJ3KU7cCZJzEKGKwEfXpu 2Rb6CU=
  • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
  • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
  • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
  • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
  • List-subscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
  • Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209

    • Thanks Bertrand,
      
      I’m fine as well with this option. Repeating it here:
      
      "Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned".
      
      Could the secretariat let us know if they still believe there is any text that is "unnecessarily duplicated" or if they could live with that?
      
      Note that it seems that emails using DMARC still get wrong to the mailing list. It will be very important that the secretariat resolves that, otherwise, some participants are not getting emails from some of us (including me). So, no wonder that they don’t respond!
      
      Regards,
      Jordi
      @jordipalet
      
      
      
      El 21/2/20 15:14, "Bertrand Cherrier" <mailto:sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net en nombre de mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> escribió:
      
      Hello everyone,
      Thank you Jordi for this revised prop.
      How about this :
      
      Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned.
      
      It would be nice to have inputs from other members of the Policy SIG, especially from those who opposed this proposal.
      Regards,
      Cordialement,
      
      Bertrand Cherrier
      Administration Systèmes - R&D
      Micro Logic Systems
      mailto:b.cherrier@micrologic.nc
      https://www.mls.nc
      Tél : +687 24 99 24
      VoIP : 65 24 99 24
      SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
      
      On 21 Feb 2020, at 11:09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
      Hi all,
      
      As you know, we have decided to continue the discussion of this proposal in the mailing list.
      
      I've been thinking in a possible way to keep the "documented purposes" text as some indicated in the mike.
      
      So, what do you feel about these two choices:
      
      Option a)
      2.2.3. Assigned address space
      Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate.
      
      Option b)
      2.2.3. Assigned address space
      Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned to other networks.
      
      My personal preference, and following the staff analysis in v2, will be option a, but just in case the community prefers to re-state "and may not be sub-assigned to other networks" (I believe, and also according to the staff inputs that "exclusive" is already indicating it).
      
      Just as a reminder, the actual proposal (v2) is at:
      https://www.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/prop-133-v002.txt
      
      Regards,
      Jordi
      @jordipalet
      
      
      
      
      
      **********************************************
      IPv4 is over
      Are you ready for the new Internet ?
      http://www.theipv6company.com
      The IPv6 Company
      
      This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
      
      
      
      * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
      _______________________________________________
      sig-policy mailing list
      sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
      https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
      * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
      
      
      
      **********************************************
      IPv4 is over
      Are you ready for the new Internet ?
      http://www.theipv6company.com
      The IPv6 Company
      
      This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.