Dear SIG Chair and all,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.
I would like to share key feedback in our community for criteria for
adopting the proposal based on a meeting we organised on 4th Feb.
First of all, it should be pointed out that there is no intention to
limit the proposals where the problem statement or proposal has
Japanese community concerned that it might repeated similar
discussions if the resubmission of a proposal that was previously
My understanding is that "abandon" is a proposal that chair has
decided that no further discussions will be made in the community, is
If it is, I believe chair should indicate to the community why it was
allowed to resubmit.
And It might also need to define the criteria of resubmission.
Satoru Tsurumaki / JPOPF Steering Team
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list