Re: [sig-policy] New version - prop-133-v002: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.
I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-133,
based on a meeting we organised on 4th Feb to discuss these proposals.
Many opposing opinions were expressed about this proposal.
(comment details)
- In the discuss about previous proposal, prop-124, some opinions
were expressed as to who was in trouble and who needed to change, but
it seems that the proposer did not respond to these opinions in this
proposal.
- IP addresses should be delegated on an as-needed basis, and if this
proposal is passed, there is concern that clarification of the
intended use at the time of acquisition will be lost.
- While it may be good to loosen the policy operationally, we oppose
easing the policy itself.
- This proposal seems not to aim "Clarification" of Sub assignment.
Regards,
Satoru Tsurumaki / JPOPF Steering Team
2020年2月16日(日) 18:31 Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherrier@micrologic.nc>:
>
> Dear SIG members
>
> A new version of the proposal "prop-133-v002: Clarification on
> Sub-Assignments" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
>
> Information about earlier versions is available from:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-133
>
> You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal:
>
> Do you support or oppose the proposal?
> Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
> What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
>
> Please find the text of the proposal below.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>
> ________________________________
>
> prop-133-v002: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
>
> ________________________________
>
> Proposer: Jordi Palet Martinez
> jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
>
> 1. Problem statement
>
> Note that this proposal is ONLY relevant when end-users obtain direct
> assignments from APNIC,
> or when a LIR obtains, also from APNIC, and assignment for exclusive use
> within its infrastructure.
> Consequently, this is NOT relevant in case of LIR allocations.
>
> The intended goal of assignments is for usage by end-users or LIRs in
> their own infrastructure (servers,
> equipment, interconnections, employees, guest devices, subcontractors,
> only within that infrastructure),
> not for sub-assignment in other networks.
>
> The current text uses a “must” together with “documented purposes”. As a
> consequence, if there is a request
> with a documented purpose, and in the future the assigned space is used
> for some other purposes, it will
> violate the policy.
>
> For example, a university may document in the request, that the assigned
> addressing space will be used for
> their own network devices and serves, but afterwards they also
> sub-assign to the students in the campus
> (still same infrastructure). This last purpose was not documented, so it
> will fall out of the policy.
>
> 2. Objective of policy change
>
> Clarification of the text, by rewording it.
>
> 3. Situation in other regions
>
> This situation, has already been corrected in AFRINIC, ARIN, LACNIC and
> RIPE.
>
> 4. Proposed policy solution
>
> Actual text:
> 2.2.3. Assigned address space
> Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or
> end-user, for specific use within the Internet infrastructure they
> operate. Assignments must only be made for specific, documented purposes
> and may not be sub-assigned.
>
> Proposed text:
> 2.2.3. Assigned address space
> Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or
> end-user, for exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate.
>
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>
> Advantages:
> Advantages of the proposal:
> Fulfilling the objective above indicated and making sure to match the
> real situation in the market.
>
> Disadvantages:
> Disadvantages of the proposal:
> None foreseen.
>
> 6. Impact on resource holders
>
> Impact on resource holders:
> None.
>
> 7. References
>
> AFRINIC: https://www.afrinic.net/policy/2018-v6-002-d3#details
>
> ARIN:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#2-5-allocation-assignment-reallocation-reassignment
> and https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_15/
>
> LACNIC:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2018-7?language=en
>
> RIPE NCC: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
--
--
Satoru Tsurumaki
BBIX, Inc