With these statistics, I fail to see the problem that was being addressed as opposed to the problem is now causes by limiting the way people do their business.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Guangliang Pan <gpan@apnic.net> wrote:
Hello Owen,
There is 1.86% of the delegations from 103/8 block have been transferred by M&A. Out of that, only 5 ranges transferred more than once.
There are 152 members acquired 103/8 ranges via M&A transfers. It is 1% of the total membership (includes members under NIRs). Out of that, 123 members received one range, 16 members received two ranges and 13 members received more two
ranges.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Guangliang Pan <gpan@apnic.net> wrote:
Hi Aftab,
The number of M&A transfers involved 103/8 address block from 15 April 2011 to 14 Sep 2017 is 257.
Kind regards,
Guangliang
==========
From: Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 29 January 2018 8:49 PM To: Guangliang Pan <gpan@apnic.net> Cc: Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev@dcs1.biz>; mailman_SIG-policy <sig-policy@apnic.net> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi Guangliang,
How many M&A were processed for 103/8 address block from 15 April 2011 to 14 Sep 2017.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 at 06:43 Guangliang Pan <gpan@apnic.net> wrote:
Hi Sanjeev,
The number of delegations from 103/8 pool since 29 Jan 2013 (Five years count back from today) to 14 Sep 2017 is 10868. These are the delegations are not allowed to transfer as
of today according to prop-116-v006.
I see this as more of a "do not make policy retroactively". People who "bought" an "asset" in good faith should not be told it is worth different now.
I am amenable to changing the cut-off date in Prop-123 to the date it was sent to the Policy SIG, as that might have given warning to people the rules were changing.
APNIC Secretariat, how many transfers will be affected by Prop-123?
The proposal "prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy" has
been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 45 in
Kathmandu, Nepal on Tuesday, 27 February 2018.
We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
before the meeting.
The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
express your views on the proposal:
- Do you support or oppose this proposal?
- Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
tell the community about your situation.
- Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
- Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
- What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
effective?
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official
views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately.