Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan
Thank you so much for your comment.
> * Consideration needed on how to handle transfer of 103/8 block if
> prop-116 is adopted (Prefixes will be mixed after the exhaustion of
> unallocated final /8 pool)
I'll update prop-116 to avoid this confusion.
Yours Sincerely,
---
Tomohiro Fujsiaki
2017-09-08 15:33 GMT+09:00 Satoru Tsurumaki <satoru.tsurumaki at g.softbank dot co dot jp>:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
> I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan.
>
> I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120,
> based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals.
>
>
>
> Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be
> distributed after /8 pool exhaustion. Different ideas were shared on
> details of how to distribute.
>
> * It is appropriate to prioritise new comers to a certain extent, as
> they will be challenged if they cannot receive IPv4 address block
>
> * Different comments on the size of distribution post /8 pool exhaustion
> 1) /21 as the upper limit
> Maintain the current size
>
> 2) /22 as the upper limit
> Adjust to the limited pool post /8 pool exhaustion
>
> 3) Two blocks of /22s as the upper limit
> Separate blocks for new comers and others. New comers can queue to
> receive the other block after receiving a block for new comers
>
> Other comments:
> * Care should be taken when adopting this policy, to reflect the
> waiting list of distribution from the returned pool
>
> * Consideration needed on how to handle transfer of 103/8 block if
> prop-116 is adopted (Prefixes will be mixed after the exhaustion of
> unallocated final /8 pool)
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Satoru Tsurumaki
> Policy Working Group
> Japan Open Policy Forum
>
> 2017-08-09 15:17 GMT+09:00 chku <chku at twnic dot net dot tw>:
>> Dear SIG members
>>
>> The proposal "prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan" has been sent
>> to the Policy SIG for review.
>>
>> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will
>> be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September
>> 2017.
>>
>> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
>> before the meeting.
>>
>> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
>> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
>> express your views on the proposal:
>>
>> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>> effective?
>>
>> Information about this proposal is available at:
>>
>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-120
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
>> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> prop-120-v001: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki
>> fujisaki at syce dot net
>>
>>
>> 1. Problem statement
>> --------------------
>>
>> APNIC makes IPv4 address delegation from two IPv4 pools. These are the
>> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool.
>>
>> Currently, there are no IPv4 addresses in the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered
>> pool and APNIC manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved
>> requests. And, based on the Geoff's projection (*1), the 103/8 (Final
>> /8) pool will be exhausted in a few years.
>>
>> It will be necessary to make a guidance about how to manage the IPv4
>> delegation after both IPv4 pools exhaustion.
>>
>>
>> 2. Objective of policy change
>> -----------------------------
>>
>> To provide a guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion.
>>
>>
>> 3. Situation in other regions
>> -----------------------------
>>
>> None.
>>
>>
>> 4. Proposed policy solution
>> ---------------------------
>>
>> Guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion:
>>
>> - The first time an approved request cannot be fulfilled from the 103/8
>> pool, Final /8 delegations will end.
>>
>> - APNIC will begin to manage only one (Recovered) IPv4 pool containing
>> any residual 103/8 space and all future returns, including 103/8 returns.
>>
>> - Each new account holder can receive up to a /21 from the IPv4
>> Recovered pool.
>>
>> - Existing account holders who have not yet received the maximum /21
>> from the two pools may continue to apply for space from the Recovered
>> pool until they have received a maximum /21 from the two pools.
>>
>> - A waiting list will be created if approved requests cannot be
>> fulfilled. Each new account holder will be given priority in the
>> waiting list.
>>
>>
>> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>> -----------------------------
>>
>> Advantages:
>>
>> - Possible to avoid confusion at 103/8 address pool exhaustion date
>>
>> Disadvantages:
>>
>> None.
>>
>>
>> 6. Impact on resource holders
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> No impact to resource holders.
>>
>>
>> 7. References
>> -------------
>> 1. IPv4 Address Report
>> http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sig-policy-chair mailing list
>> Sig-policy-chair at apnic dot net
>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy