[sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region, to b

    • To: "sig-policy" <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
    • Subject: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region, to be dis cussed at APNIC 44 Policy SIG
    • From: "chku" <chku at twnic dot net dot tw>
    • Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:13:49 +0800 (CST)
    • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
    • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
    • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
    • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
    • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
    • List-subscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
    • List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
      • 
        The proposal "prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region" was discussed at
        APNIC 43 Policy SIG, but did not reach consensus.
        
        It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will 
        be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September 
        2017.
        
        Information about the proposal is available from:
        
            http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-118
        
        You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal:
        
         - Do you support or oppose the proposal?
         - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
         - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
         - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
        
        Please find the text of the proposal below.
        
        Kind Regards,
        
        Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
        APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
        
        
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        prop-118-v001: No need policy in APNIC region
        
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Proposer:       David Hilario
                        d.hilario at laruscloudservice dot net
        
        
        1. Problem statement
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Whenever a transfer of IPv4 is taking place within the APNIC region, the
        recipient needs to demonstrate the "need" for the IPv4 space they intend
        to transfer.
        
        Companies transferring IPv4 space to their pool do this in ordcer to
        enable further growth in their network, since the space is not coming
        from the free public pool, regular policies that are intended to protect
        the limited pool of IPv4 space can be removed in transfers.
        
        
        2. Objective of policy change
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Simplify transfer of IPv4 space between resource holders.
        Ease some administration on APNIC staff.
        
        
        3. Situation in other regions
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        RIPE region has an all around no need policy in IPv4, even for first
        allocation, transfers do not require the recipient to demonstrate their
        intended use of the resources .
        
        ARIN, need base for both transfers and resources issued by ARIN.
        
        AFRINIC, need based policy on transfers (not active yet) and resource
        request from AFRINIC based on needs.
        
        LACNIC, no transfers, need based request.
        
        Out of all these RIR, only ARIN and RIPE NCC have inter-RIR transfer
        policies,  ARIN has made clear in the past that the "no need" policy
        from the RIPE region would break inter-RIR transfers from ARIN to RIPE
        region.
        
        
        4. Proposed policy solution
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Simply copy the RIPE policy to solve the ARIN transfer incompatibility:
        
         - APNIC shall accept all transfers of Internet number resources to its
           service region, provided that they comply with the policies relating
           to transfers within its service region.
        
         - For transfers from RIR regions that require the receiving region to
           have needs-based policies, recipients must provide a plan to the
           APNIC for the use of at least 50% of the transferred resources within
           5 years.
        
        source:
            https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-644
        
        
        5. Advantages / Disadvantages
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Advantages:
        
         - Harmonisation with RIPE region.
         - Makes transfer simpler and smoother within APNIC and between APNIC
           and RIPE.
         - maintains a compatibility with ARIN.
         - Removes the uncertainty that a transfer may be rejected based on
           potentially badly documented needs.
         - Lowers the overall administrative burden on APNIC staff.
        
        Disadvantages:
        
        none.
        
        
        6. Impact on resource holders
        -------------------------------------------------------
        None
        
        
        7. References
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        Sig-policy-chair mailing list
        Sig-policy-chair at apnic dot net
        https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair
        
        Dear SIG members
        
        The proposal "prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region" was discussed at
        APNIC 43 Policy SIG, but did not reach consensus.
        
        It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will 
        be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September 
        2017.
        
        Information about the proposal is available from:
        
            http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-118
        
        You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal:
        
         - Do you support or oppose the proposal?
         - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
         - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
         - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
        
        Please find the text of the proposal below.
        
        Kind Regards,
        
        Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
        APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
        
        
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        prop-118-v001: No need policy in APNIC region
        
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Proposer:       David Hilario
                        d.hilario at laruscloudservice dot net
        
        
        1. Problem statement
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Whenever a transfer of IPv4 is taking place within the APNIC region, the
        recipient needs to demonstrate the "need" for the IPv4 space they intend
        to transfer.
        
        Companies transferring IPv4 space to their pool do this in ordcer to
        enable further growth in their network, since the space is not coming
        from the free public pool, regular policies that are intended to protect
        the limited pool of IPv4 space can be removed in transfers.
        
        
        2. Objective of policy change
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Simplify transfer of IPv4 space between resource holders.
        Ease some administration on APNIC staff.
        
        
        3. Situation in other regions
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        RIPE region has an all around no need policy in IPv4, even for first
        allocation, transfers do not require the recipient to demonstrate their
        intended use of the resources .
        
        ARIN, need base for both transfers and resources issued by ARIN.
        
        AFRINIC, need based policy on transfers (not active yet) and resource
        request from AFRINIC based on needs.
        
        LACNIC, no transfers, need based request.
        
        Out of all these RIR, only ARIN and RIPE NCC have inter-RIR transfer
        policies,  ARIN has made clear in the past that the "no need" policy
        from the RIPE region would break inter-RIR transfers from ARIN to RIPE
        region.
        
        
        4. Proposed policy solution
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Simply copy the RIPE policy to solve the ARIN transfer incompatibility:
        
         - APNIC shall accept all transfers of Internet number resources to its
           service region, provided that they comply with the policies relating
           to transfers within its service region.
        
         - For transfers from RIR regions that require the receiving region to
           have needs-based policies, recipients must provide a plan to the
           APNIC for the use of at least 50% of the transferred resources within
           5 years.
        
        source:
            https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-644
        
        
        5. Advantages / Disadvantages
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        Advantages:
        
         - Harmonisation with RIPE region.
         - Makes transfer simpler and smoother within APNIC and between APNIC
           and RIPE.
         - maintains a compatibility with ARIN.
         - Removes the uncertainty that a transfer may be rejected based on
           potentially badly documented needs.
         - Lowers the overall administrative burden on APNIC staff.
        
        Disadvantages:
        
        none.
        
        
        6. Impact on resource holders
        -------------------------------------------------------
        None
        
        
        7. References
        -------------------------------------------------------
        
        
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        Sig-policy-chair mailing list
        Sig-policy-chair at apnic dot net
        https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair