Hi Aftab,
2017-01-29 20:54 GMT+09:00 Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>:
>
>>
>> 1. Problem statement
>> --------------------
>> APNIC currently makes delegations from two IPv4 pools. These are the
>> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool.
>>
>> With current policy, all returned address space, including 103/8 blocks,
>> will be merged into the IPv4 Recovered pool.
>
>
> Under which policy 103/8 returned addresses will be merged in recovered
> pool? Please share the reference.
My understanding is that after prop-105 was implemented, returned IPv4
address processing was changed, and current practice is merging all
returned addresses into the recovered pool.
Please refer the transcript at APNIC 42, and chair's e-mail to the
policy sig ML.
Email:
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2016/11/msg00001.html
>From the transcript of APNIC 42:
https://conference.apnic.net/42/program#/schedule/day/8/policy-sig-3
> I think the Secretariat is
>
> looking for more input from the community about
>
> where returned 103s should be because currently we
>
> are putting them in the recovered pool, which would
>
> be very complicated if this policy went ahead.
Yours Sincerely,
---
Tomohiro Fujisaki
2017-01-29 20:54 GMT+09:00 Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>:
>
>>
>> 1. Problem statement
>> --------------------
>> APNIC currently makes delegations from two IPv4 pools. These are the
>> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool.
>>
>> With current policy, all returned address space, including 103/8 blocks,
>> will be merged into the IPv4 Recovered pool.
>
>
> Under which policy 103/8 returned addresses will be merged in recovered
> pool? Please share the reference.
>
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy