[sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresse

    • To: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
    • Subject: [sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block
    • From: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>
    • Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:05:40 +0900
    • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
    • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HCAcGYEYOiXpGZg969IhsSNvW+p9tJ+UrbCJ3JsJ3bI=; b=IVIK1kJ1ljOcN9oxgiQW0aYlay5HFYNIVyb+1Bk8ruMYyEpAcOURdixzWW6gA6iHFI xVEjbTWFvRxes+bwOE6KbKOrotTUpps4kZGY3LdN7ObaZlPfcyxRWRePtNx/7+9L286q IC696W6d+reTwSMdlbCH25CtpSIJD3xKqcOYNpxZXWNLdf1N8cTKtILmcRjS+tzsdade Fe1A6ZUKi2NgtU1twlLPkrabmGwEHWhrQHnZOyWEn7/gYdLh22VctwN7ZEtsd2/EIDdo wKVLXiviBq6IumXPo4NoTl6PqJRz6uM+StKFACtDfkctgHaC13LaVqWHCCgtZXm8GJj0 GXGA==
    • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
    • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
    • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
    • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
    • List-subscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
      • Dear SIG members

        A new version of the proposal "prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4
        addresses in the final /8 block" has been sent to the Policy SIG for
        review.

        Information about earlier versions is available from:

        http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-116

        You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal:

         - Do you support or oppose the proposal?
         - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
         - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?

        Please find the text of the proposal below.

        Kind Regards,

        Masato, Sumon

        -------------------------------------------------------

        prop-116-v002: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

        -------------------------------------------------------

        Proposer:       Tomohiro Fujisaki
                        fujisaki at syce dot net




        1. Problem statement
        --------------------

        There are a lot of transfers of IPv4 address blocks from 103/8
        happening, both within the APNIC region and among RIRs.

        Then number of transfer from 103/8 block are about 200, which is
        about 12% of the total number of transfers. This looks so hight
        high, since APNIC manages about 40/8.

        And based on the information provided by APNIC secretariat, number
        of transfers from the 103/8 block are increasing year by year.

        Provided by George Kuo on the sig-policy ML at 8th September 2016:

        1) M&A transfers containing 103/8 space

        +------+-----------+-----------+-
        |      |   Total   | Number of |
        | Year | Transfers |   /24s    |
        +------+-----------+-----------+-
        | 2011 |         3 |         12 |
        | 2012 |        10 |         46 |
        | 2013 |        18 |         66 |
        | 2014 |       126 |        498 |
        | 2015 |       147 |        573 |
        | 2016 |        45 |        177 |
        +------+-----------+------------+-

        2) Market transfers containing 103/8 space

        +------+-----------+-----------+
        |      |   Total   | Number of |
        | Year | Transfers |   /24s    |
        +------+-----------+-----------+
        | 2011 |         2 |         2 |
        | 2012 |        21 |        68 |
        | 2013 |        16 |        61 |
        | 2014 |        25 |        95 |
        | 2015 |        67 |       266 |
        | 2016 |        56 |       206 |
        +------+-----------+-----------+


        And also, transfers from the 103/8 block include:
          - Take place within 1 year of distribution, or
          - Multiple blocks to a single organization in case of beyond 1 year.

        Further, there is a case where a single organization have received 12
        blocks transfers from 103 range.

        see:  https://www.apnic.net/transfer-resources/transfer-logs

        From these figures, it is quite likely that substantial number of 103/8
        blocks are being used for transfer purpose.

        This conflicts with the concept of distribution of 103/8 block
        (prop-062), which is intended to accommodate minimum IPv4 address blocks
        for new comers.

         prop-062: Use of final /8
         https://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-062


        2. Objective of policy change
        -----------------------------

        When stated problem is solved, distribution from 103/8 block will be
        consistent with its original purpose, for distribution for new entrants
        to the industry. Without the policy change, substantial portion of 103/8
        blocks will be consumed for transfer purpose.


        3. Situation in other regions
        -----------------------------

        RIPE-NCC has been discussing to prohibit transfer under the final /8
        address block.


        4. Proposed policy solution
        ---------------------------

        Prohibit transfer IPv4 address under /8 address block (103/8).
        If the address block allocated to a LIR is not needed any more, it have
        to return to APNIC to allocate to another organization.

        In the case of transfers due to M&A, merged organization can have
        up to /22 IPv4 address in the 103/8 block. The 103/8 IPv4 address
        more than /22  have to return to APNIC to allocate to another
        organization.


        5. Advantages / Disadvantages
        -----------------------------

        Advantages:
          - It makes 103/8 blocks available according to the original purpose,
            as distribution for new entrants (rather than being consumed for
            transfer purpose)

          - IPv4 addresses under final /8 are not transferred to outside APNIC.

          - By prohibiting transfer them, it is possible to keep one /22 for
            each LIRs state,  which is fair for all LIRs.

        Disadvantages:

        None.


        6. Impact on resource holders
        ------------------------------

          - LIRs cannot transfer address blocks under 103/8. No big impact while
            they use it.

          - Organizations which needs to receive transferred IPv4 can continue
            to do so, outside 103/8 blocks (which should be made available for
            new entrants)


        7. References
        -------------