Hello Aftab, all The Services and Finance teams have helped us out with the following data as you requested. I’ll reply in-line. On 27/06/2016, 18:43, "sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net on behalf of Aftab Siddiqui" <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net on behalf of aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com> wrote:
In the last 12 months we have received 1,329 reports of invalid Whois contacts.
We have a total of 6401 active Member and Non-Member accounts. Of them 5839 have MyAPNIC access. This would not include NIR accounts.
At APNIC 38 we reported that 87% of accounts had registered an IRT contact object. Following that we did some work as part of the Whois Data Quality Improvement project and can now report that 96% of accounts now have IRT objects. This leaves about 260 without and we will look into why that is. These numbers are based on MyAPNIC activity. Some may have registered via email – that would be a small number, if any.
Finance Department reports that on average we get around 100 to 110 bounces each month from billing contacts. I hope this data helps. Please feel comfortable to ask for any other information you need. We will do our best to provide what you need. Regards Adam _______________________________________________________ Adam Gosling Internet Policy Development Consultant, APNIC e: adam at apnic dot net p: +61 7 3858 3142 m: +61 421 456 243 t: @bout_policy _______________________________________________________ Join the conversation: https://blog.apnic.net/ _______________________________________________________
|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature