Re: [sig-policy] Updated Text - Prop-114v003
Hash: SHA1
I support this.
- -gaurab
On 3/5/15 4:50 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> In this text, the suggested guidelines have been removed to be
> replaced with:
>
> " - you have been previous allocated provider independent address
> space by APNIC AND
>
>
> - intend to multi-home in the future
>
> "
>
>
> This policy can be reviewed on an annual basis for any impact on
> the number of allocations of ASN and if there has been any
> detrimental effect.
>
>
> ======
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> prop-114-v003: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Proposer: Aftab Siddiqui
>
> aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com <mailto:aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>
>
>
> Skeeve Stevens
>
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com
> <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com>
>
>
>
> 1. Problem statement
>
> --------------------
>
>
> The current ASN assignment policy states two eligibility criteria
> and that both criteria should be fulfilled in order to obtain an
> ASN. The policy seems to imply that both requirements i.e.
> multi-homing and clearly defined single routing policy must be met
> simultaneously, this has created much confusion in interpreting the
> policy.
>
>
> As a result organizations have either provided incorrect
> information to get the ASN or barred themselves from applying where
> they still have a valid justification for obtaining an ASN.
>
>
>
> 2. Objective of policy change
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> In order to make the policy guidelines simpler we are proposing to
> modify the text describing the eligibility criteria for ASN
> assignment by providing alternate criteria to obtaining an ASN.
>
>
>
> 3. Situation in other regions
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> ARIN:
>
> It is not mandatory but optional to be multi-homed in order get
> ASN
>
>
> RIPE:
>
> Policy to remove multi-homing requirement is currently in
> discussion and the current phase ends 12 February 2015 (awaiting
> Chair decision)
>
> Policy - https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03
>
>
> LACNIC:
>
> Only inter-connect is mandatory not multi-homing
>
>
> AFRINIC:
>
> It is mandatory to be multi-homed in order to get ASN.
>
>
>
> 4. Proposed policy solution
>
> ---------------------------
>
>
> An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if:
>
>
> - they are currently multi-homed OR
>
>
> - you have been previous allocated provider independent address
> space by APNIC AND
>
>
> - intend to multi-home in the future
>
>
>
>
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> Advantages:
>
>
> By adding the additional criteria of Guidelines managed by APNIC
> Secretariat, this would enable the Secretariat to make decisions
> based on common or rare use cases, but that may still be a valid
> request.
>
>
> Disadvantages:
>
>
> It may be perceived that this policy would enable members to
> obtain ASN’s more easily, and in return cause faster consumption of
> ASN’s in the region. Given the relative ease of obtaining an ASN
> with ‘work around’ methods, we do not perceive this will actually
> have any effect.
>
>
>
> 6. Impact on resource holders
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> No impact on existing resource holders.
>
>
>
> 7. References
>
> -------------
>
>
>
> ======
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego
> Networks service skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ;
> www.v4now.com <http://www.v4now.com/>
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/v4now <http://facebook.com/v4now> ;
> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>
>
> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> * _______________________________________________ sig-policy
> mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
- --
http://www.gaurab.org.np/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAlT36SwACgkQSo7fU26F3X2cuACglPD0tyZJ49oDuOD/Kqedsvcx
FsAAnj1U/+8Jgy8T1VEwrT60krby/puw
=rl5N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----