[sig-policy] Policy SIG session schedule

To: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Subject: [sig-policy] Policy SIG session schedule
From: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 18:18:21 -0800
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/XKq3KoGwU2weMye88J3ckqHy+FR9KV7i+GotnrkEvE=; b=mvX58dN9vDjHGDbkpllDk+NXUfNoyfGBf8LkAYBZt7NNgDAEcVaXAViF7/xwAPlyoC AV1IobM3rm/WWgZtA/NoQTdyppe6EkMw0K3hQgV5XYZL/ughJ7L6RV5o+ryEYnYPqEd3 stCF69E5SpRdVuXWU2qFhaGzoCX+BnV8qu2l4ghs8JRjKdzK7ikb7+NuT4nTCRliBFT4 bR50SzwqPx4iRj+wYxNf2DDZouyYzJnVyfofSpIIUyEIKpLKJiAkTgqWw2Ga792XtwP+ pRJ9ZwRJhUg1kNmU3lCnp7uR45serT55t6YtV89AJzbPplwjQpH2HlkZIjWxXQY3dNxA e9Bw==
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>

Dear All,

While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean during the ML discussion,

it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is best for Policy SIG.

Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu.

However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation?

(e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?)

Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG?

(I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned)

Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in Fukuoka.

Regards,

Masato Yamanishi

APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting)