Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN
Hash: SHA1
On 2/25/15 11:10 PM, David Farmer wrote:
> A network of 1 or 2 routers probably doesn't justify an ASN unless
> it is multi-homed or connected to an IX. A network of 100 routers
> probably justifies an ASN regardless. Then the question becomes,
> where to draw the line.
even more slippery slope. eg. AS 29216 has a single upstream, with
just 2 prefixes (one v4, one v6). and they have a legitimate need, so
size is irrelevant.
- -gaurab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAlTvNvoACgkQSo7fU26F3X10YACgtvvwLsn/IBjwM0hzZyw5gry9
tV0AoMjytMyN2Mgwm6Qr0m1DUE1GS5zo
=uwQr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----