[sig-policy] New Version of prop-115-v001: Registration of detailed assi

    • To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
    • Subject: [sig-policy] New Version of prop-115-v001: Registration of detailed assignment information in whois DB
    • From: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>
    • Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:52:10 -0600
    • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
    • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=abqz4g9Xnae7KWLVm3NtryhI+npOp3kuhYLsDKDcbyU=; b=CF+d2xm9ruJj71XlpvTdZjbtbTuE4c9rWWPBoen6ZQJ8+xmevRP/N0M/nLydaArUPO pu8TUac1jgWYL4XCxbhh52z5SPE8EunZtj+J9Eoc0mcMfTiWz6dKZLDX8hJkcYqNNl/Y +v3RjYK9d0sHdKN04r1yaWP+GXul2CWfXVrp1jP4PUG+nJatbC5iXInWYvPveY3oU3xC RG9aYDJwPotchpm+ZK5ljbA08uuwHuFp65kfjEbJZR/rQjZtU331bt7MZbai1YI+tPkY PyAKoBob4c6lsgtilsihaXF2u3NlYWeYdJG8drzKS/YljLIwuOO6oHVcTVCEqtwqVjOm yqGg==
    • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
    • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
    • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
    • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
    • List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
      • Dear SIG members

        The Problem statement "Registration of detailed assignment information
        in whois DB" has been assigned a Policy Proposal number following the
        submission of a new version sent to the Policy SIG for consideration.

        The proposal, "prop-115-v001: Registration of detailed assignment
        information in whois DB" now includes an objective and proposed solution.

        Information about this and earlier versions is available from:

            http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-115

        You are encouraged you to express your views on the proposal:

         - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
         - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
           tell the community about your situation.
         - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
         - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
         - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
           effective?



        Regards,

        Masato



        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        prop-115-v001: Registration of detailed assignment information in
                       whois DB
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Proposer:      Ruri Hiromi
                       hiromi at inetcore dot com

                       Tomohiro Fujisaki
                       fujisaki at syce dot net


        1. Problem statement
        --------------------

            Recently, there are some cases need to get IP address assignment
            information in more detail to specify user IP address.

            With out this information, operators cannot filter out specific
            address range, and it might lead to 'over-filter' (i.e. filtering
            whole ISP's address range).

            For example:

            1) 'Port' range information in IPv4

                ISPs are using 'CGN' or other kinds of IPv4 address sharing
                technology with assignment of IP address and specified port
                range to their users.

                In this case, port information is necessary to specify one user.

                ex) 192.0.2.24/32 1-256 is for HomeA
                    192.0.2.24/32 257-511 is for HomeB

                or 192.0.2.0/24 1-65536 is shared address of ISP-X
                minimum size is /32

            2) address assignment size information in IPv6

               The IPv6 address assignment size may be different from ISP to
               ISP, and address ranges in one ISP. Address assignment prefix
               size will be necessary.

               ex) 2001:db8:1::0/56 is for HomeA
                   2001:db8:1:1::0/48 is for HomeB

                   or 2001:db8:1::/36's minimum size is /56


        2. Objective of policy change
        -----------------------------

            Lots of operators look a record when harmful behavior coming to
            their network to identify its IP address confirming it can be
            filtered or not.

            The goal is providing more specific information to support these
            actions.


        3. Situation in other regions
        -----------------------------

            No same regulation/discussion can be seen in other regions.


        4. Proposed policy solution
        ---------------------------

            Provide accurate filtering information generated from whois DB.

            For IPv4, propose to add 'port range' information to IP address
            entry.

            For IPv6, propose to provide 'assignment prefix size' information
            for specific IPv6 address.


        5. Advantages / Disadvantages
        -----------------------------

        Advantages:

         - operators can set filtering by IP address based on correct assignment
           information base.

         - users who share same address space can be avoid to be including bulk
           filtering.

        Disadvantages:

         - registration rule will move to more strict manner.

         - strict watch and control in registration of database records.

         - additional record or option will be considered.

         - privilege for withdrawing detailed information will be set for these
           records.


        6. Impact on APNIC
        ------------------

            This might be beyond the scope of using whois DB.


        7. Other Consideration
        ----------------------

            For the security reason, this detailed records may be able to see
            only by operators.(some kind of user control/privilege setting is
            needed)

            For hosting services, /32 in IPv4 and /128 in IPv6 registration
            should be discussed based on its operability and possibility. But a
            harmful activities to filter by IP addresses are coming from hosting
            services as well. Here it seemed to be some demands.


        References
        ----------

            TBD