[sig-policy] [New Problem Statement] prop-115: Registration of detailed

    • To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
    • Subject: [sig-policy] [New Problem Statement] prop-115: Registration of detailed assignment
    • From: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>
    • Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:00:19 -0600
    • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
    • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=deiT4LC4BZwMRPxIC+fG9mb4pZnVD/OMWpoSoDET9+E=; b=Cjz6lczaOLOS/oTZeE/dYAgG8Ur8qCke/1aF6xDtXXkYbGBCvjxjn5C0JObUe/3xQ4 Yi1t1je5dOvsem3GSPa96g0mFkyPo3QxVD43ks/olQYaRTYKlX5AtmSr2VcVROlHn4HV IjBbmOZpcWOjGXNDFCAUHigah47nUwSyx1Q/bTOahUegEVcgg8S4Y/ytPMDg2VhytYKz xdk5H5CqTQekAr5G8laifK3gWHnWwetHtQzi6JH9I1vQZGd5yCpnFyU9r1aq96mhaqbh eriaE30lfwqQvTD2LSJYdRW4iJAXZulrmcwmBJWVaA08w9+x5Lcmn70kiGDPwyYteG8l NQhw==
    • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
    • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
    • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
    • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
    • List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
      • Dear SIG members

        A Problem Statement, identified as "prop-115: Registration of detailed
        assignment information in whois DB" has been sent to the Policy SIG for
        review and further discussion, or development by the community.

        It  will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 39 in Fukuoka,
        Japan on Thursday, 5 March 2015.

        We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
        before the meeting.

        The purpose of submitting a Problem Statement is to reflect that the
        author(s) are unsure exactly what policy changes are required to
        Resolve the stated problem.

        It is an invitation to discuss the severity of the problem and to discuss
        possible solutions, whether they are through policy changes, or some
        other mechanism.

        I would encourage those who share the author’s view that this problem
        should be resolved to participate in the discussion by posting their views
        and suggestions to the list.

        Regards,

        Masato




        -----------------------------------------------------------------
        prop-115-v001: Registration of detailed assignment information in
                       whois DB
        -----------------------------------------------------------------

        Proposer:      Ruri Hiromi
                       hiromi at inetcore dot com

                       Tomohiro Fujisaki
                       fujisaki at syce dot net


        1. Problem statement
        --------------------

            Current information in Whois DB does not have enough, detailed
            record if operator in an network use it for filtering.

            To cover this, we propose modification towards whois DB.

            1) IPv4 address assignment information has "minimum assignment
               network space/or declare shared address" and "port number" which
               for shared address space.

               ex) 192.0.1.24/32 1-256 is for HomeA
                   192.0.1.24/32 257-511 is for HomeB

             2) IPv6 address assignment information also has "minimum assignment
                network space"

                ex) 2001:db8:1::0/56 is for HomeA
                    2001:db8:2::0/48 is for HomeB

             3) for the security reason, this detailed records may be able to
                see only operators.(some kind of user control is needed)


        2. Objective of policy change
        -----------------------------

            Under community development


        3. Situation in other regions
        -----------------------------

            Under community development


        4. Proposed policy solution
        ---------------------------

            Under community development


        5. Advantages / Disadvantages
        -----------------------------

        Advantages:
            Under community development


        Disadvantages:
            Under community development



        6. Impact on resource holders
        -----------------------------

            Under community development


        7. References
        -------------