Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-110: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycas
On 2/13/14, 16:44 , Dean Pemberton wrote:
Hi Mike,
I like David's way of handling the issue that you raise.
By saying that "... it is acceptable to filter this prefix at an
administrative boundary, if an operator desires. Further, it should
be made clear it is not acceptable to advertise this prefix to the
Global Internet."
Glad to be of help. :)
I'm interested in your comment here regarding the IXP situation.
Would 1.2.3.4 being advertised onto an IXP by a willing participant be
something that you'd see a problem with?
It would certainly be possible to place wording into the policy which
places an expectation that operators should filter this at their AS
boundary. I'm interested in whether people think this would
unreasonably restrict the benefit of some fo the use cases of this
prefix.
I'm not sure you want to completely prescribe an answer here, it should
be a local decision for the community or operator of an IXP. Maybe just
suggest that IXPs should consider local policy on the issue, especially
for peering with the IXP's route server if their is one. For a direct
peering across the exchange it should be up to the two peers to decide.
Maybe add a recommendation of ask first as a general rule.
Also, if this turns out to work really well, I'm skeptical of that by
the way, and it becomes really popular I could see this as a potential
service an IXP could provide its members. But, it is way premature to
recommend anything like that.
Dean
--
Dean Pemberton
Technical Policy Advisor
InternetNZ
+64 21 920 363 (mob)
dean at internetnz dot net dot nz
To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: farmer at umn dot edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================