Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor
My apologies for the delayed reply.
On the cost of extending the RPKI system to cover the need of this proposal, it really depends on the degree of automation desired in managing the registration of this particular block. A fully automated process will not cost much at all. Any manual oversight of the process will likely increase the cost significantly. Any idea how heavy/lightweight the registration process should be?
Regards,
Sanjaya
> Sanjaya, Gaurab has bought to light an important issue which is
> central to this proposal. Could I request information regarding the
> marginal cost of creation of an additional RPKI ROA to an existing
> allocation be made public to the list. I appreciate that exact
> figures may be difficult to obtain given the tight time constraints,
> to make this easier, an upper and lower bound on this cost would also
> be fine
>
> Once again, thanks for bringing up this issue Gaurab.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Dean Pemberton
>
> Technical Policy Advisor
> InternetNZ
> +64 21 920 363 (mob)
> dean at internetnz dot net dot nz
>
> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy