Re: [sig-policy] prop-106-v001: Restricting excessive IPv4 address trans
>> All due respect to the authors, but mooting these two 'options' to (what I see as a non-existant) problem drags bottom-up stakeholder governance over to the dark side of enabling bureaucratic enforcement of financial and forfeiture barriers upon business operations.
> Ah, yes, the ever present belief that any attempt to regulate business in the common interest is evil.
Ah, yes, the ever present fantasy that RIRs creating increasingly Byzantine policies will help deal with the fact that IPv4 supply can't meet demand.
Creating new entities to circumvent the /8 policy was a blatantly obvious outcome. Not bothering to do transfers and thereby reducing the usefulness of the APNIC whois database would be the blatantly obvious outcome of prop-106. Not sure that's particularly desirable.
However, the fractal pattern of deck chairs is interesting to look at I suppose.
Regards,
-drc