Re: [sig-policy] Post Prop-103
Is it your view that the current PDP fulfils the communities needs?
If not what changes would you propose?
Regards,
Dean
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 9/12/12 1:51 AM, Dean Pemberton wrote:
>> So it seems that we have two sets of requirements.
>
> I thought the only requirement was to reduce process, not make more of
> it.
>
> - -gaurab
>
> - --
>
> http://www.gaurab.org.np/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlBQbO8ACgkQSo7fU26F3X2cmgCg6PYV+b1pvidv7kc+rwJYdh8v
> v8wAnA8s93ye/RaIyOsrTmr96qrhzRhV
> =F4wX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
--
Regards,
Dean