> within the current PDP. > > . A Problem Statement is posted to the Policy-SIG list outlining a > problem or issue with the current APNIC policies. I like this :-) > . The proposer leads conversation on the Policy-SIG list to develop > possible solutions to this Problem Statement. I would suggest either proposer or policy-sig chair/co-chairs. > . At this stage the APNIC Secretariat can comment if they consider > that the Problem Statement can be covered within current policies. > . When the proposer feels that they have a solution to their Problem > Statement, they draft a policy and submit it in a similar fashion as > occurs currently within the PDP. > > This will ensure that policy proposals have a clearly stated problem > statement and that any major objections are at least voiced early in > the process. Great. Thanks for drafting this. Regards, Seiichi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature