Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99 (SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED)
APNIC 33 (http://meetings.apnic.net/33/policy/transcript#xing-li).
No additional material has been introduced to the discussion since that
time, so my position remains that I see no reason to support the
proposal. I am not convinced that there is an issue of sufficient
criticality and generality that it should warrant the introduction of
specific APNIC policy to address it.
I appreciate that there will be a few cases where the existing policies
might cause some potential IPv6 routing table size increases for the few
very, very large ISPs concerned. There are a number of non-policy ways
that might be used to address this.
I oppose the adoption of proposal-099
Regards
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net On Behalf Of Andy Linton
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012 19:32
> To: SIG policy
> Subject: [sig-policy] Proposal 99
>
> Dear SIG members
>
> Following considerable discussion at the APNIC 33 Policy SIG
> meeting, Version 2 of prop-099: IPv6 Reservation for Large
> Networks, did not reach consensus and was returned to the
> mailing list for further discussion.
>
> Since then there has been no further discussion of the proposal.
>
> The author has confirmed his intention to bring this proposal
> before the SIG at APNIC 34 and we would encourage those for,
> or against, the proposal to indicate their position so the
> SIG Chairs can take these views into consideration when
> gauging community consensus.
>
> Now is also a good time to raise any concerns or seek
> clarification on any matters prior to the meeting, so that
> our time there is well spent.
[SNIP]
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.