Now that version 004 of this policy has removed the sunset clause, I
support this proposal.
Regards
Dean
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org> wrote:
> We'd like to remind you all that this proposal was returned to the mailing
> list for discussion before the next meeting. It would be great to see some
> discussion on the list before we get much closer to the meeting in August.
>
> Regards
>
> Andy, Skeeve, and Masato
>
> ---
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Masato Yamanishi
> <myamanis at japan-telecom dot com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear SIG members
>>
>> # I'm sending this notification on behalf of Andy Linton, Policy SIG chair
>>
>> Version 3 of prop-101 Removing multihoming requirement for IPv6 portable
>> assignments, did not reach consensus at the APNIC 33 Policy SIG.
>> Therefore, this proposal is being returned to the author
>> and the Policy SIG mailing list for further discussion.
>>
>> The author has submitted a revised proposal, prop-101-v004, for further
>> discussion on the Policy SIG mailing list.
>>
>>
>> Proposal details
>> ---------------------
>>
>> This is a proposal to change the "IPv6 address allocation and assignment
>> policy" to allow portable (that is, provider independent or PI)
>> assignments of IPv6 address blocks to be made by APNIC to any
>> organization with due justification and payment of standard fees,
>> removing the current requirement that the requestor is or plans to be
>> multihomed.
>>