[sig-policy] New Version: prop-102-v003: Sparse allocation guidelines fo

  • To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
  • Subject: [sig-policy] New Version: prop-102-v003: Sparse allocation guidelines for IPv6 resource allocations
  • From: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:17:30 +0530
  • Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of asjl@lpnz.org designates 10.68.197.165 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=asjl@lpnz.org; dkim=pass header.i=asjl@lpnz.org
  • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
  • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
  • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
  • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
  • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
  • List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
  • Organization: LPNZ
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
    • 
      Version 003 of the proposal "prop-101:  Sparse allocation guidelines for
      IPv6 resource allocations" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
      It will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 33 in New Delhi, India,
      on 1 March 2012.
      
      This new version of the proposal reflects feedback from the community
      received on the Policy SIG mailing list:
      
             - Section 4 now calls for the Secretariat to publish details of
      the sparse allocation
               rather than requiring its use.
      
      The proposal text is available below or at the following URL:
      
      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-102/prop-102-v003.txt
      
      Information about this and other policy proposals is available from:
      
                   http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals
      
      
      Regards,
      
      Andy, Skeeve, and Masato
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      prop-102-v003: Sparse allocation guidelines for IPv6 resource
                       allocations
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      
      Author:  Dean Pemberton
                 <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
      
      Co-authors:  Ren-Hung Hwang
                     <rhhwang at gmail dot com>
      
      
      
      1.  Introduction
      ----------------
      
      This proposal also requires that the details of any sparse allocation
      algorithm used for the allocation by APNIC of IPv6 resourcesmust be
      published on the website, and any revisions should be handled inline
      with the procedures contained within APNIC-112.
      
      
      
      2.  Summary of the current problem
      ----------------------------------
      
      Large networks and economies are requesting  blocks of IPv6 space larger
      than the current allocation models allow. At present the allocation
      strategies look at a timeline on the order of 1-2 years.  Organisations
      are now having to look to a 5-10 year time-frame when deploying large
      IPv6 networks.
      
      They are understandably concerned about their ability to secure access
      to 5-10 years of aggregatable address space if they are only allocated
      on 1-2 year needs basis. We have seen requests in proposals such as
      prop-98, prop-99 and prop-100, which seek to find ways to allow for
      larger allocations or reserve an amount of space for future
      organisational use. All of these proposals seek to make large changes to
      the way that IPv6 addresses are allocated by APNIC in order to address
      these legitimate concerns.
      
      It would seem however that there is an alternative solution which would
      only require a small change to current operating procedure.
      
      At present the APNIC operating procedure is for hostmasters to use a
      method of sparse-allocation when allocating IPv6 addresses out of the
      APNIC free pool.
      
      The sparse-allocation allows for allocations to
      be given from a larger pool in such a way that members can request
      neighbouring allocations at a later date and aggregate these together in
      to a larger routable allocation.
      
      While this has been APNIC operating procedure for some time, the
      specific details of the algorithm have not been publically published.
      As such the exact algorithm used as well as the parameters around this
      sparse-allocation algorithm are not open to member input or comment
      through a consultation process.
      
      3.  Situation in other RIRs
      ---------------------------
      
      Unknown at this point.
      
      
      4.  Details
      -----------
      
      This proposal seeks to make the following additions/changes to APNIC
      policy
      
            1.  APNIC must publish the details of any sparse allocation
                framework on the APNIC website as a numbered document.  Changes
                to this document should be handled as per APNIC-112 "APNIC
                document editorial policy".
      
      
      5.  Pros/Cons
      -------------
      
      Advantages:
      
            -  APNIC Members will have visibility of the details of any sparse
               allocation algorithm used by APNIC to allocate IPv6 resources
      
      
      Disadvantages:
      
            -  The hostmasters would be required to document and publish the
               sparse allocation mechanism.
      
               This may have an increased workload requirement.  It is not
               anticipated that this increase would be significant as changes to
               the algorithm are not expected to occur frequently.
      
      
      6.  Effect on APNIC Members
      ---------------------------
      
      APNIC members would be able to see the published details of the sparse
      allocation policy used by APNIC to allocate IPv6 resources from its
      address pool.
      
      
      7.  Effect on NIRs
      ------------------
      
      The policy would apply when NIRs request address space from APNIC
      The proposal allows NIRs to choose when to adopt this policy for their
      Members.