Re: [sig-policy] prop-102-v002: Sparse allocation guidelines for IPv6 re
During the session explaining the current/future sparse allocation
models yesterday, I suggested that the secretariat might like to
publish the presented details as a numbered document. I suggested
that if they were willing to do this that I would happily redraw
prop-102.
The reply was they they would rather see how the proposal went in the
policy sig before agreeing to publicly document the procedures.
Given that reply, and the others over the last 12 hours, I will ammend
the policy once more to reflect a single documentation requirement. I
will submit this to the Policy-SIG chairs momentarily.
Regards,
Dean
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:56 AM, HENDERSON MIKE, MR
<MICHAEL.HENDERSON@nzdf.mil.nz> wrote:
> Providing transparency on this process by publishing the SOP and making the
> SOP document subject to a formal change control process (APNIC-112) is a
> good thing.
>