Yup, would be glad to hear from someone from Secretariat.
From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net [mailto:sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of Aftab Siddiqui
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 5:26 AM
To: Izumi Okutani
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-102-v002: Sparse allocation guidelines for IPv6 resource allocations
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
2012/2/29 Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Hi Aftab,
I'm not really sure about the process for revising operational guidelines.
> So, it means operational guidlines can not be ameded by policy? [Just for
> my understanding]
Perhaps someone from the APNIC secretariat or perhaps the Policy SIG
Chair be able to answer this better?
JPNIC is against setting it as a fixed criteria that the secretariat
> or is it just JPNIC stance.
must follow, or scrutinizing the operational details.
It is probably the best to leave it to the secretariat's decision as
they are the experts on how to manage their address pool.
Regards,
Izumi
(2012/02/29 20:57), Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
>
>> Our understanding of sparse allocation is it's an operational decision
>> APNIC/RIR makes to help in aggregation and it shouldn't be forced.
>>
>>
>>
>
> So, it means operational guidlines can not be ameded by policy? [Just for
> my understanding]
>
> or is it just JPNIC stance.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>
>
>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy