Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
Re: [sig-policy] Is the multihoming requirement necessary for IPv6 porta
To
: David Woodgate <
dwoodgate5 at gmail dot com
>
Subject
: Re: [sig-policy] Is the multihoming requirement necessary for IPv6 portable assignments?
From
: Arturo Servin <
aservin at lacnic dot net
>
Date
: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:59:20 -0200
Cc
:
sig-policy at apnic dot net
Delivered-to
:
sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to
: <
4f1e4407.a387980a.271d.370f at mx dot google dot com
>
List-archive
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy
>
List-help
: <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help
>
List-id
: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post
: <
mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>, <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>, <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe
>
References
: <
9ABFDED5-7C2F-46E8-89D6-B36EAB9E4871@bluesky.as
> <
CB3ED2B5.61105%jordi.palet@consulintel.es
> <
4f1e4407.a387980a.271d.370f@mx.google.com
>
Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
Prev by Date:
Re: [sig-policy] Is the multihoming requirement necessary for IPv6 portable assignments?
Next by Date:
Re: [sig-policy] Is the multihoming requirement necessary for IPv6 portable assignments?
Previous by thread:
Re: [sig-policy] Is the multihoming requirement necessary for IPv6 portable assignments?
Next by thread:
Re: [sig-policy] Is the multihoming requirement necessary for IPv6 portable assignments?
Index(es):
Date
Thread