[sig-policy] Policy talk in the media - India favours change in Net numb

To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: [sig-policy] Policy talk in the media - India favours change in Net number resource allocation
From: Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:59:58 +1300
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0


"India favours change in Net number resource allocation:  It wants
countrywide allocation in Asia-Pacific region rather than to companies"
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/internet/article2485006.ece

I think there's a lot of work required before we can reach any sort of
consensus on the issue of how to allocate large IPv6 blocks and it would
be good to get that discussion started well in advance of New Delhi.

Following on from the discussion in Busan, where are people's heads with
the three proposals which got punted back to the list?

Regards,
Dean