wrote: > Thing is… I agree with you when it comes to > Interconnects, and so on, where I am much more > conservative, using /112's where a lot of people are > using much larger (64s, etc). I've never quite understood why a point-to-point link would have anything other than a /126 (I've seen some folks doing a /127, a little too risque for me). We use /112's for BMA LAN's (like among various routers in a production network). It's more than we shall ever need on a single LAN, but it's not as perverse as a /64, given that we manually assign our devices their v6 addresses. I'm just not sure how many devices you can address on a point-to-point link that has only two devices on either end of it. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.