On Aug 29, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Naresh Ajwani wrote:
organization beyond their 5 year projection. As such, I think it provides most of the "contiguous block" benefit sought in this proposal to the extent that it is meaningful to the internet at large. Of course, it does not facilitate aggregating an entire economy behind a single prefix, which could never actually be routed that way anyway, but, it does effectively give you contiguous aggregates for each organization with a growth model that definitely limits the likelihood of organizations having need for significant additional prefixes. (Outgrow a /32, get an additional /28. Outgrow that, get an additional /24, etc.) I think that organizations which grow more than 17x having as many as 3 prefixes is within the scaling limits of the internet routing table. Owen
|