Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan - Allocationof co
Regards and best wishes,
Naresh Ajwani
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 29, 2011, at 8:49, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego dot net> wrote:
> Dear Naresh,
>
> Do not misunderstand... while engineers opinions are critical, the opinions
> of policy makers, sovereign requirements should also be taken into
> consideration.
>
> I agree with you very much that this is not just a requirement for India
> and a wider policy covering the requirements of Prop-100 and perhaps
> Prop-99 could come to fruition. I believe there have been some very
> valuable discussions happening over the last 48 hours which I believe, if
> it is implemented well, with considered input from engineers, policy
> makers and others, would address the requirements of all regions requiring
> reservations of address space.
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> --
> Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
> skeeve at eintellego dot net ; www.eintellego.net
> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> facebook.com/eintellego or eintellego at facebook dot com
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>
> --
> eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
> - Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Naresh Ajwani <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 06:18:59 +0530
> To: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at eintellego dot net>
> Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, "sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net"
> <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>, "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net"
> <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>
>> Dear Skeeve,
>>
>> When I referred to respecting views, it was precisely over this thought
>> that only skilled and experienced engineers can have opinions. :-)
>>
>> Frankly, this proposal, while not limited to any specific country has a
>> requirement for one large project in India.In my opinion, the same can be
>> applied for without going through this policy process. Please comment.
>>
>> Regards and best wishes,
>>
>> Naresh Ajwani
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:48, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego dot net> wrote:
>>
>>> Naresh,
>>>
>>> I realise that you think that people are not respecting views here in
>>> some
>>> casesŠ but the problem I see is that it is not a case of respect in this
>>> case.
>>>
>>> It is a simple matter of technical implementation and practicality and
>>> you
>>> are hearing the opinions of many many highly skilled and experienced
>>> engineers who have worked for large carriers and build world wide
>>> networks.
>>>
>>> India is no different to any other nation with regards to how its
>>> networks
>>> are built and runŠ you have to understand that we are all the same, and
>>> that the collective experience of the people who go to the APNIC
>>> conference is the most valuable opinion you will EVER get.
>>>
>>> ŠSkeeve
>>>
>>> --
>>> Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
>>> skeeve at eintellego dot net ; www.eintellego.net
>>> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>>> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>> facebook.com/eintellego or eintellego at facebook dot com
>>> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>>>
>>> --
>>> eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
>>> - Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
>>> Reply-To: <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
>>> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:22:30 +0000
>>> To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>,
>>> <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
>>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
>>> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>>>
>>>> Also, one hour tutorial shud take place on respecting views.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Naresh Ajwani
>>>> ------Original Message------
>>>> From: Randy Bush
>>>> Sender: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
>>>> To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>>> Sent: Aug 27, 2011 11:54 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
>>>> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>>>>
>>>> apnic meeting organizers and policy sig chairs,
>>>>
>>>> at this late date, is it possible to add a one hour tutorial on
>>>> inter-domain routing basics to the front of the policy sig meeting?
>>>> it appears as if we are going to need it to have the discussion of
>>>> prop-100 be at all reality based.
>>>>
>>>> if pfs won't give it, i will.
>>>>
>>>> randy
>>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>>> *
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry(R) smartphone from Tata Indicom
>>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>>> *
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>