Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -Allocationof cou
Regards and best wishes,
Naresh Ajwani
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:44, "Alastair Johnson" <aj at sneep dot net> wrote:
> Hello Naresh,
>
> Could we please have more information on this project? Hopefully that will allow all to understand the requirement for prop-100 better.
>
> I currently see no technical benefits to prop-100, and when you are "selling" to a technical community having no technical benefits is a hard conversation.
>
> More info will help.
>
> Regards,
> aj
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Naresh Ajwani <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
> Sender: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 06:18:59
> To: Skeeve Stevens<Skeeve at eintellego dot net>
> Cc: Randy Bush<randy at psg dot com>; sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net<sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>; sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net<sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>
> Dear Skeeve,
>
> When I referred to respecting views, it was precisely over this thought that only skilled and experienced engineers can have opinions. :-)
>
> Frankly, this proposal, while not limited to any specific country has a requirement for one large project in India.In my opinion, the same can be applied for without going through this policy process. Please comment.
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Naresh Ajwani
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:48, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego dot net> wrote:
>
>> Naresh,
>>
>> I realise that you think that people are not respecting views here in some
>> casesŠ but the problem I see is that it is not a case of respect in this
>> case.
>>
>> It is a simple matter of technical implementation and practicality and you
>> are hearing the opinions of many many highly skilled and experienced
>> engineers who have worked for large carriers and build world wide networks.
>>
>> India is no different to any other nation with regards to how its networks
>> are built and runŠ you have to understand that we are all the same, and
>> that the collective experience of the people who go to the APNIC
>> conference is the most valuable opinion you will EVER get.
>>
>> ŠSkeeve
>>
>> --
>> Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
>> skeeve at eintellego dot net ; www.eintellego.net
>> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>> facebook.com/eintellego or eintellego at facebook dot com
>> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>>
>> --
>> eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
>> - Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
>> Reply-To: <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
>> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:22:30 +0000
>> To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>,
>> <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
>> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>>
>>> Also, one hour tutorial shud take place on respecting views.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Naresh Ajwani
>>> ------Original Message------
>>> From: Randy Bush
>>> Sender: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> Sent: Aug 27, 2011 11:54 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
>>> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>>>
>>> apnic meeting organizers and policy sig chairs,
>>>
>>> at this late date, is it possible to add a one hour tutorial on
>>> inter-domain routing basics to the front of the policy sig meeting?
>>> it appears as if we are going to need it to have the discussion of
>>> prop-100 be at all reality based.
>>>
>>> if pfs won't give it, i will.
>>>
>>> randy
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>> *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Tata Indicom
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>> *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy