Re: [sig-policy] prop-100 National IP Address Plan - Allocation of count
not always about deliveryŠ but we're all unique individuals (some more
unique than others ;-)
I think it is too late for APNIC 32 to do a routing 101 courseŠ but it
would be possible for DeliŠ and indeed perhaps most valuable since it is
close to many of the developing nations in that region. I am REALLY
looking forward to New Deli and would also offer our services for some one
of one more advanced routing training (for free) to those who might
benefit. But it is Apricot, and some of those areas are undoubtedly
covered already.
ŠSkeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego dot net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellego or eintellego at facebook dot com
twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
--
eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade
-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:47:05 -0700
To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Cc: <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-100 National IP Address Plan - Allocation
of country-wide IP address blocks
>
>On Aug 27, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>>> While I will not be at the APNIC meeting, I think this would be
>>> extremely valuable. In off-list discussions (mostly unrelated to this
>>> proposal), I have been surprised at the level of misunderstanding of
>>> basic inter-domain routing 'physics'. I privately suggested to the
>>> chair a survey be undertaken to try to gauge the knowledge level of
>>> APNIC policy discussion participants, but a tutorial would probably be
>>> a better approach.
>>
>> in the long run, it might save more time than it costs.
>
>Though this does not happen often, I find myself agreeing with Randy.
>
>The discussion around proposal 100 has made it very clear that this is
>most definitely needed.
>
>Owen
>
>* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
>_______________________________________________
>sig-policy mailing list
>sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy