Re: [sig-policy] Pro-100:National IP Address Plan - Allocation of countr
Community is keen to support this proposal with little more detailing on logics for the proposed size. You are free to add the same in your proposal.
Regards and best wishes,
Naresh Ajwani
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:23, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
>> There are customers both Multi homed and non multihomed. Trading and
>> renumbering is not possible because ISPs and APNIC allocate IPs from
>> different pools. This is precisely the solution proposed to address by
>> assigning bigger pools.
>
> you keep saying this, but you keep omitting the part which explains at a
> technical level how larger pools help. and folk who have a history of
> routing clue do not believe they do. so the onus is on you.
>
> randy
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy