Re: [sig-policy] Call for policy proposals for APNIC 32
- To: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Call for policy proposals for APNIC 32
- From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:52:36 +0300
- Cc: APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <4DE4070F.8070407 at lpnz dot org>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <4DE2B9F3.6040808@lpnz.org> <m2ipssg1jz.wl%randy@psg.com> <4DE4070F.8070407@lpnz.org>
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
>>> distributing IPv4 addresses according to the final /8 policies. >> >> was that really the case? looking at geoff's numbers, it appears as if the >> trigger may be been pulled a little early. could the secretariat comment? > > I have asked the Secretariat for more information on this. Are there > specific points you want me to raise with them. start with http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-April/035234.html and then read up on TEPCO and whitewashing techniques :) randy