Re: [sig-policy] prop-092: Distribution of additional APNIC IPv4 address
Auction? ;-)
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego dot net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade - Arista - Allied Telesis
Disclaimer: Limits of Liability and Disclaimer: This message is for the
named person's use only. It may contain sensitive and private proprietary
or legally privileged information. You must not, directly or indirectly,
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you
are not the intended recipient. eintellego Pty Ltd and each legal entity
in the Tefilah Pty Ltd group of companies reserve the right to monitor all
e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
views of any such entity. Any reference to costs, fee quotations,
contractual transactions and variations to contract terms is subject to
separate confirmation in writing signed by an authorised representative of
eintellego. Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard inbound and outbound
e-mails, we cannot guarantee that attachments are virus-free or compatible
with your systems and do not accept any liability in respect of viruses or
computer problems experienced.
-----Original Message-----
From: Terence Zhang YH <zhangyinghao at cnnic dot cn>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:36:44 +1100
To: APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>, "dwoodgate5 at gmail dot com"
<dwoodgate5 at gmail dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-092: Distribution of additional APNIC IPv4
address ranges after IANA exhaustion
>
>Hi, David,
>
>I understand it's not neccessary to apply the final /8 policy to the
>space receive after exhausion,
>but I have one question, when APNIC receive 2*/16 space and receive
>address requests
>of /16 from 10 members, how the secretariat is going to allocate them?
>do you mean the decision and process should be designed by the
>secretariat?
>
>Regards
>
>Terence Zhang
>CNNIC
>* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
>_______________________________________________
>sig-policy mailing list
>sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy