Re: [sig-policy] prop-091: Limiting of final /8 policy to specific /9
> actual problem that an organisation NEEDS IPv4 which cannot be
> satisfied by the current policies.
( i suspect this is not what you meant, but i'll base a rant on it
anyway :-)
since we're gonna be flat out of ipv4 space, there will be a jillion
organizations which need/want ipv4 space that can not get what they
need/want.
it continues to amaze me that people just don't seem to get this. out.
end. no more. fini. done. no, you just can't have it because it's
just not there.
the trade-off here is simple. there is a last reserve for our children.
we do not really know how it will be needed or used, so we made what we
think is a prudent reserve. now we have the forces of greed wanting a
week's worth of sugar rush by breaking into the stash and swallowing
half of it (and, as andy says, then the next half, zeno's paradox)
before it we even reach the point of first needed it at all.
this is plain nuts.
randy