Re: [sig-policy] The full picture WAS Re: prop-088: Distribution of IPv4
I'd also be interested in a full public accounting of all current address
space regardless of it's state, reserved or otherwise.
Best,
-M<
On 11/30/10 10:37 PM, "Terry Manderson" <terry at terrym dot net> wrote:
>
> Addressing this separately as I tried to find a reference but couldn't.
>
> I vaguely recall that the APNIC Debogon Project discovered a set of addresses
> that were far to 'dirty' and APNIC decided to exclude these from future
> allocation.
>
> Surely those would be a suitable candidate to include in a RIR/NIR public
> registry of unallocated/reserved/RQA-status/etc??
>
>>
>> I don't know of any list of "reserved addresses" addresses like
>> ---
>> $ whois 1.0.0.0
>> % [whois.apnic.net node-3]
>> % Whois data copyright terms http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
>>
>> inetnum: 1.0.0.0 - 1.0.0.255
>> netname: Debogon-prefix
>> descr: APNIC Debogon Project
>> descr: APNIC Pty Ltd
>> ...
>> ---
>
> Cheers
> Terry
> (ps sorry for hijacking the prop-88 policy thread)
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy