Re: [sig-policy] Four last minute policy proposals not appropriate for S

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Four last minute policy proposals not appropriate for SIG
From: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:11:58 +1000
Authentication-results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <m2k4oqa9kd.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Cisco Systems
References: <m2k4oqa9kd.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1

>
> Instead, we (having no real authority) have suggested that the authors
> of these proposals take such issues to the AGM or the Executive Council.
> 
> randy, Terrence, and Ching-Heng

I support the decision and suggestion by the chairs.

philip
--