Re: [sig-policy] End of comment period for APNIC 29 policy proposals
prefer to see this proposal pass.
I agree that someone should introduce a new policy proposal (which I'm
happy to help author) which would deal with the intent of the original
policy without potential for misuse.
philip
--
Paul Wilson said the following on 7/05/10 12:25 :
> Yi Chu, Masato san and all,
>
> APNIC staff have reported that this policy may have been used in certain
> cases to "amplify" address holdings, for instance by exchanging 5 /24s for
> a /21 (representing 8 /24s), and then repeating that process over time.
> While such transactions are allowed by the policy, they may be interpreted
> as cases of "misuse" of the policy.
>
> As these cases appear to be increasing, and may increase more due to
> awareness generated by this discussion, I would request that we allow the
> proposal to pass, and then consider reintroducing the policy in future with
> amendments which could prevent or reduce cases of (apparent) abuse.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paul Wilson.
>
>
>
> --On 7 May 2010 10:34:28 AM +0900 myamanis at bb.softbank dot co dot jp wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> IMHO, Yi and RandyW's comments are not objections actually,
>> rather good inputs for further improvement of this proposal.
>> (Sorry for using another terminology > Chairs)
>>
>> So, why not return to ML for further discussion unless authors have
>> urgent issue?
>>
>> Rgs,
>> Masato
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> [mailto:sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of Yi Chu
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:41 AM
>>> To: Randy Bush; Policy SIG
>>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] End of comment period for APNIC 29
>>> policy proposals
>>>
>>> I was the one raised one of the objections. I consider my
>>> objection 'substantial', as the proposal would take away a
>>> good practice for the general good of the Internet.
>>>
>>> yi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
>>> To: Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
>>> Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 4:17:06 AM
>>> Subject: [sig-policy] End of comment period for APNIC 29
>>> policy proposals
>>>
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> prop-080: Removal of IPv4 prefix exchange policy
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Dear colleagues
>>>
>>> The eight-week final comment period for the proposal 'Removal of IPv4
>>> prefix exchange policy' has ended. During the final days of
>>> the comment
>>> period there were two objections raised to the proposal. The
>>> Chairs are
>>> a bit ambivalent about whether the objections are
>>> 'substantial' or not.
>>> According to the APNIC Policy Development Process:
>>>
>>> - If the objections are considered 'substantial', it
>>> means that the
>>> proposal cannot be deemed to have reached consensus in the final
>>> comment period.
>>>
>>> - If the objections are not considered 'substantial', it
>>> means that
>>> the proposal can be deemed to have reached consensus.
>>>
>>> The Chairs therefore ask the community to help us decide whether to
>>> consider the two objections received as 'substantial'. We
>>> welcome your
>>> input on this to the mailing list by the end of Wednesday, 12 May
>>> 2010. The question we are asking is:
>>>
>>> - Do you think the objections made to prop-080 are substantial?
>>> Yes/No
>>>
>>> For a detailed history of this proposal see:
>>>
>>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-080
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>>> Randy, Ching-Heng, and Terence
>>>
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>>> policy *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>>> policy *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>> * _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC <dg at apnic dot net>
> http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy