Sorry for the delay and thanks for the clarification, On 07/08/2009, at 5:00 PM, Terence Zhang YH wrote:
According to the current status of the discussion of transfer policy proposal(prop050), we believe most people favor 'Justification is needed'I was under the impression that historical address space was excluded from the prop50 proposal.You are right, that's why we propose the same critera for historical.
Now I understand why you want to bring this in, to ensure the historical space is covered and in a registry framework in a transfer model.
Might I suggest drop the evaluation condition for historical completely as I think historical holders will probably avoid it.
If that change was done I would support the proposal. Cheers Terry