Re: [sig-policy] prop-073:Automatic allocation/assignment of IPv6
Clearly 'we' (the industry) aren't doing enough to promote IPv6... so what else can we do to facilitate adoption? I have tons of ideas and will be discussing them with people in Beijing.
But... this is a policy list... and too much off-topic talk probably isn't good.
Would anyone support a new SIG specifically for IPv6 adoption/promotion? Perhaps a BoF on the subject of IPv6 promotion to gauge the level of interest in perhaps forming a SIG?
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego dot net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg dot com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2009 9:07 PM
> To: Skeeve Stevens
> Cc: sig-policy at apnic dot net
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-073:Automatic allocation/assignment of
> IPv6
>
> > But how does it hurt?
>
> apnic should sell shoes. how does it hurt?
>
> do not confuse do no harm with do anything non harmful.
>
> randy