Re: [sig-policy] prop-078: Reserving /10 IPv4 address space to facilitat
I like the idea that this is an adjustment to the final /8 policy. When
that policy comes into play under the current allocation sizes we'd see
people get one /22 prefix per organisation. The intention was that these
organisations would not be eligible for any further blocks.
Would a change which added this /10 mechanism mean that someone who had
received a /22 also be eligible for a /24? If not, we should make that
clear.
Is there any value in having an intermediate step when there's a /9 left
that APNIC issues /23 blocks? That would extend the life of the final /8
even longer. If we take this option, we could express this policy in
terms of the allocation sizes e.g.
Address space remaining allocation size per organisation
/8 /22
/9 /23
/10 /24
andy