Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
Sorry for late reply.
> I don't think Masato-san will object to me saying so here.
Yes, I'm also comfortable for the text which was sent by Philip on last Sat.
and I would like to withdraw option-B.
Rgs,
Masato Yamanishi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
> [mailto:sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of
> Seiichi Kawamura
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 6:24 PM
> To: sig-policy
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all
>
> > How about the others who've commented in the last days?
> Anybody else?
>
> Yes, I'm comfortable with this change as well.
> - From the discussion on this list within the past few weeks,
> I would say that this will gain more support
> and I ask plan B be withdrawn from the table
> (if it hasn't been already)
> so we can finalize this proposal.
>
> I don't think Masato-san will object to me saying so here.
>
> Regards,
> Seiichi
>
>
> Andy Linton wrote:
> > On 18/07/2009, at 22:35 , Philip Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Agreed, we don't need reference to the EC for the reason you state,
> >> Terry. I think the second and third paras could simply be
> merged as:
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an
> application for
> >> further assignments or allocations earlier than this time.
> The APNIC
> >> secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully and
> >> publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
> >> identifying any member organization, these statistics will
> record the
> >> numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the
> requests
> >> come
> >> from and clearly identify if any member has made more that
> one request
> >> under these provisions.
> >> ----
> >
> >
> > Philip,
> >
> > I'm comfortable with this change - I'm guessing Terry will
> be as well.
> >
> > How about the others who've commented in the last days?
> Anybody else?
> >
> > Regards,
> > andy
> >
> >
> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource
> management policy *
> > _______________________________________________
> > sig-policy mailing list
> > sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFKZYk5crhTYfxyMkIRAn1DAJ9fnhI0rdxGon2MMLNealfbyouEzACdEg+k
> S3CLGPe7AAMeJs7UZD9BaiY=
> =ngla
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
> policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>