Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
Terry. I think the second and third paras could simply be merged as:
----
Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an application for
further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. The APNIC
secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully and
publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
identifying any member organization, these statistics will record the
numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the requests come
from and clearly identify if any member has made more that one request
under these provisions.
----
philip
--
Terry Manderson said the following on 17/7/09 16:18 :
> I'm pretty happy with this revision.
> .. I also think the reference to the EC isn't needed as they endorse
> the policy and have oversight by fiat.
>
> The observed frequency for APNIC stats publication is daily so I can
> support this.
>
> Cheers
> Terry
>
> On 17/07/2009, at 4:11 PM, Andy Linton wrote:
>
>> I think we're close to something many of us can work with. Terry and I
>> have been suggesting 12 months rather than 24 months and I had drafted
>> words not unlike Geoff's but without the reference to the EC and with
>> more detail on the stats which I was going to post. So can I suggest
>> something like:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> When a member disposes of address space using this transfer policy the
>> member should not be entitled to any further IPv4 allocations or
>> assignments from APNIC for a period of 12 months or until the
>> "final /8"
>> assignment measures are implemented.
>>
>> Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an application for
>> further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. Any such
>> application must be endorsed by the Executive Council or its delegate.
>>
>> The APNIC secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests
>> carefully
>> and publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
>> identifying any member organization, these statistics will record the
>> numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the requests
>> come
>> from and clearly identify if any member has made more that one request
>> under these provisions.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> I think that this would allow the community to have some reassurance
>> that the transfer system is not being abused.
>>
>> Note: I've deliberately left any mention of fees out of this as
>> that's a
>> task for the Executive Council.
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>> policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>