Re: [sig-policy] FW: Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
>
> The prop-50 doesn't justify use of transferred space using the allocation
> and assignment policies and restrictions, it will conflict with the goals of
> address management of Conservation and Fairness (You can see at "5 Goals of
> address space management",
<chair hat = off>
as you may remember from policy proposal prop-067, see
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-067-v001.html, i personally
am in agreement.
<chair hat = on>
but, the meeting in manila could not reach consensus on this and on the
other loophole-closing points. though i am not sure all loopholes could
ever be closed. some are probably worth trying.
i suggest that, as it we are told that it would take many months to
implement policy-50 as ammended, that you and others propose individual
single shot policies to address what you see as the critical issues.
does this make sense as a way forward?
randy