Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
> policy and to support anyone else's opinion/comments/position.
certainly. but what his message very clearly said was that he was
speaking for the ripe address policy wg.
> From: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann dot nl>
> Subject: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
> To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:23:03 +0200
>
> Hello sig-policy,
>
> As co-chair of the RIPE Address Policy Working Group I would like to
> express our concern about prop-050.
randy