FWIW, I share these concerns. -Scott On Apr 15, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
As co-chair of the RIPE Address Policy Working Group I would like tothis is an official statement of the ripe address policy wg? this wasexpress our concern about prop-050.discussed on the wg's mailing list and consensus was reached?Sorry for the confusion. No, this was not discussed on the RIPE APWG mailing list. This is just the APWG chairs having some concerns :)so, it is actually the comment one non-apnic person. thank you for yourinput. randy* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *_______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
- Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
- Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
- Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
- Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
- Index(es):